![]() How To Lose Weight Fast in 4 Days. Thank you for taking the. My plan is the Easiest Way. To Lose Weight Fast and it can help you reach your. Weight Loss Fast in Only 4 days. I’m sure you heard it all. Easy Diets To Lose Weight Fast and you’re. It’s too good to be true!” That was. ![]() I received from many of my friends and. But after seeing my. At the. end of the 4 days, their Fast Weight Loss ranged. Since. that time the 1. Thousands. Lose 1. Days and it can do the same. The other great benefits. Feel energized and alert. You will. look and feel great, sleep better, clothes fit. When your looking to lose weight while detoxing your system the GM Diet has had some great success stories. It consists of fruits, vegetables and some meat. GM diet is a weight loss management plan developed by the General Motors Corporation to help keep their employees stay in shape. Does the GM Diet really work? Read these reviews, comments and testimonials and get tips to help make your time on the diet a big success. Genetically modified food controversies are disputes over the use of foods and other goods derived from genetically modified crops instead of conventional crops, and. The 1. 8in. 4 Fast. Weight Loss Plan requires NO exercising, NO diet Pills. NO diet additives NO laxatives, NO meal replacements. ![]() ![]() Looking for the vegetarian Indian version of the popular General Motors Diet? Find the Indian version of the GM Diet with complete day to day diet plan schedule. Thank you for taking the time to visit my website. My plan is the Easiest Way To Lose Weight Fast and it can help you reach your. Find the GM diet day 6 veg & non-vegetarian version with sample meal plans for 6th day of GM diet plan. Beef/Chicken, Brown rice/Paneer, Vegetables. The General Motors diet has been around since 1985. It was originally developed by General Motors, along with the Food and Drug Administration and the United States. NO diet drinks. If you’re like me, you’ve. My fast weight loss. MY “1. 8in. 4” PROGRAMMy program is truly the. MORE, the choice is entirely. If you’re serious about the easiest way to lose. I encourage you to. The program layout is. Day- to- Day. Step- by- Step and Meal- to- Meal Guide for the first 4. Then I will explain. I did and what I continue to do every day. There is NO guessing on. It really is as easy as it sounds. My Fast. Weight Loss Plan works because it fits into the your. It is suitable for both. There are 2 parts to this. The first part is the diet, which jump- starts. The second part deals. My 1. 8in. 4 Fast Weight Loss. FRUITS. VEGETABLES, CHICKEN AND BEEFthat are eaten in specific combinations. These. combination of specific everyday foods safely work with. Protein Substitutes and Vegetarian Options. Available. Please Inquire)The great thing about the. NO special foods. TESTIMONIALSI’m ecstatic! It. has been about a month since I last emailed you. I continue to lose weight. Your plan is. absolutely amazing and I haven’t felt this good. I think the last we spoke I had lost about. I’m happily expecting to hit the. I am so. thankful for your generosity in sharing this. James. It has given me such. I’m. moving back into the world again! Lorraine, UKHey, I purchased your diet back at the start of. March after being told at a job interview that I was. This was the. kick start I needed, I always knew that I was big. I tracked down the 1. I was very skeptical at the start as to how. It is now 6 months. I have gone from 2. I. have lost over 8. I also run around. I couldn’t even. attempt 6 months ago) & regularly attend a. If people are serious about. I. have told all my friends that it works & I know that. Thank you, thank you, thank you! Ross, Chicago. Hi James,I purchased your plan last year. I started my. journey weighing over 2. I have lost over 9. I’m truly grateful to you, your weight. I highly recommended your plan to other. During my first 4 days, I lost. This diet really. I have dropped 2 Jean sizes in 3. Thanks for this marvelous diet, I’m. I’ve enclosed a. picture. Thanks again, only 1. Ricki, UKI used to sport a pear shaped body . When I started the diet, I was at. I had lost 1. 2 lbs. So I. once again went back on the diet. I still. wanted to be down to at least 1. I now. weigh 1. 42 lbs. So, in total. I lost 2. Thanks. Natalie, USAMy name is Michelle and I just wanted to say. THANK YOU for laying this plan out, it was so easy. I have tried for years to lose weight and. I. lost 1. 3 pounds in 4 days and I am so excited about. I have used your program just as you said to. Again THANK YOU!!!!! Michelle, NYWell I did the. I was very happy about and everyone noticed. I. have tried many diets and none worked, but this one. I don’t need to eat the wrong foods, treats are good. I want say thanks, you helped me. Just wanted to. let you know I. I weighed in at 2. I will never forget you. Hilary, Fort Myers. GOD BLESS THE DAY I FOUND YOU!!! I can’t thank. you enough for what you do for people!!! You’ve changed our. What is the most amazing thing about you and. WORKS. I. don’t know how much I lost but I can tell by the. I fit in – it’s a miracle!!!! Thanks a lot!!! Martin, Boston. P. S. I will NEVER forget you!!!!! I would. pay $2. 70, if I had to. How are you? My name is Terrance from New York. I. was very sceptical about your diet plan. I did not. follow your plan 1. I still lost 1. 6 pounds. I am going to go. I would have probably lost those few extra. I just fell in love with you man cause I. God Bless,Terrance, New York. I just wanted to say massive thanks! I started on. Monday and today (Friday afternoon), I am 1. I Will be doing it. Thanks again. Sam, New York. I have just completed the 4 day program with. Since I last wrote to you. I have lost 4. 2 lbs. I feel so much. better and have received several compliments. This. meal plan is excellent and the food is very good and. Because it’s so simple, it’s easy to. At times I am invited out or go to a. I try to be careful. The next day I. start over again and repeat the 4 days with a little. My meals are ready in 5. I drink lots of water with a little. Thank you again for this wonderful meal. Jane, Portland. Hey, I just. I lost 1. 2 pounds in 4. It’s an amazing plan to follow. I wasn’t even hungry or had cravings. I have. tried every diet in the book, injections, well known. The quick. results help to encourage me to continue until I. Many thanks. Lynn , Ontario Canada. Hello, I bought your diet plan last Thursday. Started my diet on Friday and finished it yesterday. Thanks. Tracey, UKI do not consider myself an optimist nor a. Being I had $2. 7. I. decided I had nothing to lose but $2. James I apologize for. I lost 1. 2 lbs in 4. I feel great. My daughter. Thanks. again. Jennifer, Utah Absolutely, impressively, awesome!!! I have. tired many diets and all I could say at the end of. WOW. Not. only did I lose 1. I feel so much better, even. I finished the diet on. Saturday and stepped on the scale today and had lost. Now I have incorporated most of the. I use to. I work. Dee, Indiana. I’ve tried everything. But whenever I was. I felt. like I was starving myself (and that’s not healthy). After using your diet, I realized that the. I was hungry all the time was because I was. Not only did you help. I’ve been trying to lose for the. I’ve kept it off for 6 months. Thanks. James. Brenda, UKThank you, thank you, you’ve changed my life and. Too bad I didn’t know about this sooner. After I completed. I lost. I’m still following your program. I’m happy. to say I lost a total of 2. My. wife thanks you too! It worked like you said. I still can’t believe it, I lost 1. HA! Cheers! Sue, UKI’ve tried other diets, but none of them have. Atkins, South Beach, they never. However. after being fortunate enough to diet with 1. I have been. able to meet my goals and I feel GREAT while doing. Thanks! Carey, Seattle. I just finished up the four day plan. It was just. what I needed to get me back into my healthy eating. I lost. about 1. 6lbs, this was just perfect. What a. wonderful gift you are sharing. Take care. Andre, USAHi James, It’s the morning after the diet. I lost 1. 8lbs. and I feel great, better than I have. Thank you so much for this diet!! Terry , Ohio. Hi, my name is Benita; I just had to email you to. I am for your program. Like so many. others, I have tried everything (literally!!) I was. I still decided to try the. All I. can say is it works, absolutely. Thanks! Benita, USAThis is Jenny again, I never thought I would lose. I did lose 1. 5. 5. Thank You So Much. Jenny, UKHi James, Thank you very much. I can’t believe. what your diet has done for me. I gained 6. 0 pounds. I have been trying to loose weight. Weight Watchers, LA Weight loss. Atkins, South Beach in addition to numerous kinds of. I wish that I had 1/3 of the money I’ve. I was so. desperate that I didn’t hesitate to spend the $2. I thought, “oh well, I have tried. I lost 2. 1. lbs, my joint pain 1. Since your diet, I no longer feel. I haven’t been to bed. It’s. amazing!! The best thing is I could not believe it. I didn’t think I would get an answer at all. You are a wonderful. Kathy, USAHello, I am not a person that had a lot to lose. I had bought. pills and spent all kinds of money trying to find. So I now. take my hat off too you this is incredible!!!!!!!!!! You are. very real and James this really works” I am staying. I know how to eat right’ because of this. Thank you so much I hope many buy your diet. Prinny, USAThanks for the input. A total of 1. 7 pounds – not bad at all. I will continue to on the plan to lose more. Thanks Again. Daniela. USAJames, I was skeptical about the 1. I have already lost 2. Thanks. Mark, Canada I just wanted to tell you I really can’t believe. I’ve lost in 4days. I’ve lost. 1. 7lbs I will be honest with you I. I lost 4. 1lbs since I started a. Thanks so much you have changed. I think about eating! Joseph, CAYes! I’ve wanted to lose my. After having my first baby 6 months. I lost 1. 6 lbs with your diet. Thank you so much. Now that I’m back to my old self. I just wanted to lose that last 1. Thank again for your. I can’t tell you enough how good it feels. Lisa, Michiganan. Hey, I told you I would let you know my results. I. lost 1. 3 lbs in 4 days I did it on. Thanks. again. Anna, UKORDER 1. WITH CONFIDENCE! I am sure you are asking the. Can I really lose weight fast in only 4. If you can follow a. SIMPLE DIET for. ONLY 4 DAYS. Day- to- Day, Step- by- Step, Meal- to- Meal Guide. Than my. Answer is YES! It really is as easy and simple as. If you are not satisfied with your. Lose 1. 8lbs in. 4 days” weight loss plan, I will. Day full money back. My Guarantee is designed so you have plenty. I teach you. in my program without any risk on your part. If. you don’t reap the great benefits from this. I know you are going to be thrilled with the. Please Note: The “Lose. NOT suitable for. Sincerely,James Zeta. ORDERING MY “1. 8in. PROGRAMThank you for taking the time to. If you feel this plan is not for you, that’s ok. If you wish. to order 1. It’s. EASY to Download, there’s. NO WAITING. and you can START NOW! The program. is IMMEDIATELY. DOWNLOADED onto your computer and you can. LOSE WEIGHT. NOW! Due to the. importance of Personal and Credit Card Security; 1. Pay. Pal and is. SECURED WITH SSLPay. Pal. is the most secure and trusted payment processor. Members. With. Pay. Pal. you can shop without sharing your financial. Genetically modified food controversies - Wikipedia. Genetically modified food controversies are disputes over the use of foods and other goods derived from genetically modified crops instead of conventional crops, and other uses of genetic engineering in food production. The dispute involves consumers, farmers, biotechnology companies, governmental regulators, non- governmental organizations, and scientists. The key areas of controversy related to genetically modified food (GM food or GMO food) are whether such food should be labeled, the role of government regulators, the objectivity of scientific research and publication, the effect of genetically modified crops on health and the environment, the effect on pesticide resistance, the impact of such crops for farmers, and the role of the crops in feeding the world population. In addition, products derived from GMO organisms play a role in the production of ethanol fuels and pharmaceuticals. Specific concerns include mixing of genetically modified and non- genetically modified products in the food supply. Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle led to the 1. Pure Food and Drug Act, the first major US legislation on the subject. The public came to see the latter as . Oz, Oprah, and Bill Maher. In 2. 00. 1 no such foods had been designated as unacceptable by Orthodox rabbis or Muslim leaders. Other groups such as GMWatch and The Institute of Science in Society concentrate mostly or solely on opposing genetically modified crops. The idea has since been adopted to varying degrees by companies like Syngenta. Instead, PABE found that public had ? Who benefits from their use? Who decided that they should be developed and how? Why were we not better informed about their use in our food, before their arrival on the market? Why are we not given an effective choice about whether or not to buy these products? Have potential long- term and irreversible consequences been seriously evaluated, and by whom? Do regulatory authorities have sufficient powers to effectively regulate large companies? Who wishes to develop these products? Can controls imposed by regulatory authorities be applied effectively? Who will be accountable in cases of unforeseen harm? Rather than zero risk, what they demanded was a more realistic assessment of risks by regulatory authorities and GMO producers. During this period protests against Calgene's Flavr Savr GM tomato mistakenly described it as containing fish genes, confusing it with DNA Plant Technology's fish tomato experimental transgenic organism, which was never commercialized. Advocates support mandatory labeling laws for food made from GMOs . The number of protesters who took part is uncertain; figures of . Events took place in between 3. The protests were reported by news outlets including ABC News. This was followed by the spraying of a crop of potato seedlings. The sentencing judge accused Greenpeace of cynically using junior members to avoid risking their own freedom. The offenders were given 9- month suspended sentences. Heckler. In 1. 98. P. Shalala. In this case, the plaintiff argued both for mandatory labeling on the basis of consumer demand, and that GMO foods should undergo the same testing requirements as food additives because they are . The plaintiff also alleged that the FDA did not follow the Administrative Procedures Act in formulating and disseminating its policy on GMO's. The federal district court rejected all of those arguments and found that the FDA's determination that GMO's are Generally Recognized as Safe was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The court gave deference to the FDA's process on all issues, leaving future plaintiffs little legal recourse to challenge the FDA's policy on GMO's. The paper produced a public uproar and demonstrations, however by 2. Cornell University's Elson Shields was the spokesperson for one group of scientists who opposed such restrictions. The group submitted a statement to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2. While favoring protection of intellectual property rights, the editors called for the restrictions to be lifted and for the EPA to require, as a condition of approval, that independent researchers have unfettered access to genetically modified products for research. This agreement left many scientists optimistic about the future. They found that financial conflict of interest was not associated with study outcome (p = 0. Of the 4. 3 studies with financial or professional conflicts of interest, 2. According to Marc Brazeau, an association between professional conflict of interest and positive study outcomes can be skewed because companies typically contract with independent researchers to perform follow- up studies only after in- house research uncovers favorable results. In- house research that uncovers negative or unfavorable results for a novel GMO is generally not further pursued. Most studies were performed years after the approval of the crop for human consumption. Papers were often imprecise in their descriptions of the histological results and the selection of study endpoints, and lacked necessary details about methods and results. The authors called for the development of better study guidelines for determining the long- term safety of eating GM foods. They concluded that GM crops had given farmers economic advantages but found no evidence that GM crops had increased yields. They also noted that weed resistance to GM crops could cause major agricultural problems but this could be addressed by better farming procedures. The leader of the research group, Federico Infascelli, rejected the claim. The research concluded that mother goats fed GM soybean meal secreted fragments of the foreign gene in their milk. In December 2. 01. However, in 2. 01. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel said that . Countries differ in their risk assessments and regulations. Marked differences distinguish the US from Europe. Crops not intended as foods are generally not reviewed for food safety. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques. They suggested that GM foods have extensive biological, toxicological and immunological tests and that substantial equivalence should be abandoned. He claimed that characterizing differences is properly a starting point for a safety assessment. Kuiper noted practical difficulties in applying this standard, including the fact that traditional foods contain many toxic or carcinogenic chemicals and that existing diets were never proven to be safe. This lack of knowledge re conventional food means that modified foods may differ in anti- nutrients and natural toxins that have never been identified in the original plant, possibly allowing harmful changes to be missed. For example, corn damaged by insects often contains high levels of fumonisins, carcinogenic toxins made by fungi that travel on insects' backs and that grow in the wounds of damaged corn. Studies show that most Bt corn has lower levels of fumonisins than conventional insect- damaged corn. The FDA found that all of the 1. Japanese regulators for 1. This equivalence was confirmed by more than 8. Hence, the authors argue, compositional equivalence studies uniquely required for GM food crops may no longer be justified on the basis of scientific uncertainty. Allergen testing is routine for products intended for food, and passing those tests is part of the regulatory requirements. Organizations such as the European Green Party and Greenpeace emphasize this risk. Genetic engineering can have less impact on the expression of genomes or on protein and metabolite levels than conventional breeding or (non- directed) plant mutagenesis. For example, the kiwi fruit was introduced into the U. S. In the early 1. Pioneer Hi- Bred attempted to improve the nutrition content of soybeans intended for animal feed by adding a gene from the Brazil nut. Because they knew that people have allergies to nuts, Pioneer ran in vitro and skin prick allergy tests. The tests showed that the transgenic soy was allergenic. These cases have been used as evidence that genetic modification can produce unexpected and dangerous changes in foods, and as evidence that safety tests effectively protect the food supply. It was also found in Japan and South Korea. As of 2. 01. 2 it was the only human feeding study to have been conducted with GM food. The transgene was detected in three volunteers from a group of seven who had previously had their large intestines removed for medical reasons. As this gene transfer did not increase after the consumption of the modified soy, the researchers concluded that gene transfer did not occur. In volunteers with intact digestive tracts, the transgene did not survive. A 2. 01. 4 review found that the performance of animals fed GM feed was similar to that of animals fed . The review concluded that . The review also stated that its conclusions were in agreement with three earlier reviews. Domingo and Bordonaba reviewed the literature again in 2. The General Accounting Office (in a review of FDA procedures requested by Congress) and a working group of the Food and Agricultural and World Health organizations both said that long- term human studies of the effect of GM food are not feasible. The reasons included lack of a plausible hypothesis to test, lack of knowledge about the potential long- term effects of conventional foods, variability in the ways humans react to foods and that epidemiological studies were unlikely to differentiate modified from conventional foods, which come with their own suite of unhealthy characteristics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
July 2017
Categories |